Nova Observatory · Live Markets — loading
Opinion · 27 April 2026

The political economy of remittance corridors

Why France-Senegal stays expensive while France-Morocco quietly improved: a story about banks, bilateral agreements, and what regulators choose to measure.

By Fatou Sarr
Independent Researcher · Former World Bank consultant
27 April 2026, 00:00 GMT·6 min read

In 2015, sending €200 from Paris to Dakar cost a sender approximately 8.4% in combined fees and FX spread. In 2025, the same transfer costs 6.1%. Over the same decade, France-Morocco fell from 7.1% to 3.4%. Both corridors share a sender market, a regulatory framework, and roughly comparable transfer volumes. They diverged because Morocco's central bank made interoperability a measured KPI, and the BCEAO did not.

What gets measured

Bank Al-Maghrib publishes quarterly corridor cost data, broken down by operator. The BCEAO publishes annual aggregates. Public scrutiny follows the data — and so does competitive pressure.

Transparency is not a policy. It is the precondition for any policy that aims to lower prices.
About the author
Fatou Sarr

Twelve years working on financial inclusion policy across West and North Africa. Recently published with IMF Working Papers on diaspora flows.

DisclosureThe views expressed are the author's own and do not represent Nova RealFi or Nova Observatory. Op-eds are signed, sourced and edited for clarity only — not for stance.